<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High SNR distribution of eigen-values of a Wishart Matrix</title>
	<link>http://windowsil.org/2008/11/12/high-snr-distribution-of-eigen-values-of-a-wishart-matrix/</link>
	<description>Your window into the Wireless Systems Innovation Laboratory</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Haochuan Zhang</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2008/11/12/high-snr-distribution-of-eigen-values-of-a-wishart-matrix/#comment-45121</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2008/11/12/high-snr-distribution-of-eigen-values-of-a-wishart-matrix/#comment-45121</guid>
					<description>Yes, the result is very nice. Indeed, after deriving the first order expansion on the marginal distribution of each Wishart eigenvalue,I find that the exponent of $x$ remains the same even in the presence of spatial correlation and line-of-sight effect. In other words, the diversity order of each MIMO sub-channel is independent of the two factors above. This is very interesting and somewhat amazing, at least to me.

PS. Thank you, Rahul Vaze, for the nice paper. Also,  WindoWSIL is a nice place. ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the result is very nice. Indeed, after deriving the first order expansion on the marginal distribution of each Wishart eigenvalue,I find that the exponent of $x$ remains the same even in the presence of spatial correlation and line-of-sight effect. In other words, the diversity order of each MIMO sub-channel is independent of the two factors above. This is very interesting and somewhat amazing, at least to me.</p>
<p>PS. Thank you, Rahul Vaze, for the nice paper. Also,  WindoWSIL is a nice place. ^_^
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rahul Vaze</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2008/11/12/high-snr-distribution-of-eigen-values-of-a-wishart-matrix/#comment-44083</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2008/11/12/high-snr-distribution-of-eigen-values-of-a-wishart-matrix/#comment-44083</guid>
					<description>It should be included in the chapter that deals with precoders, beamforming etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be included in the chapter that deals with precoders, beamforming etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Heath</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2008/11/12/high-snr-distribution-of-eigen-values-of-a-wishart-matrix/#comment-44082</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2008/11/12/high-snr-distribution-of-eigen-values-of-a-wishart-matrix/#comment-44082</guid>
					<description>Indeed a very nice result. We should include this somewhere in the MIMO book. I wonder where? Of course, it seems more useful for analyzing MIMO methods that depend on the smaller(est) values instead since it is only good for small x.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed a very nice result. We should include this somewhere in the MIMO book. I wonder where? Of course, it seems more useful for analyzing MIMO methods that depend on the smaller(est) values instead since it is only good for small x.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

