<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Diversity Multiplexing Tradeoff</title>
	<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/</link>
	<description>Your window into the Wireless Systems Innovation Laboratory</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: mimo wireless &#187; Blog Archive &#187; History Behind Switching Between Multiplexing and Diversity for MIMO Systems</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-30894</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-30894</guid>
					<description>[...] The concept of switching between diversity and multiplexing should not be confused with the diversity-multiplexing tradeoff (DMT). The reason is that the DMT is an analysis tool. It is good for understanding performance of families of space-time formatting techniques over all channel realizations but does not provide insight into choosing the best technique for a given channel realization. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The concept of switching between diversity and multiplexing should not be confused with the diversity-multiplexing tradeoff (DMT). The reason is that the DMT is an analysis tool. It is good for understanding performance of families of space-time formatting techniques over all channel realizations but does not provide insight into choosing the best technique for a given channel realization. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The WindoWSIL &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Finite-SNR Diversity-Multiplexing Tradeoff</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-22979</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-22979</guid>
					<description>[...] After my post on the diversity-multiplexing tradeoff, which seemed to create confusion instead of alleviating it, Prof. Heath asked me to clarify the finite-SNR diversity-multiplexing tradeoff proposed by Narasimhan in [1] (pdf). The previous explanation of the Zheng-Tse DMT really simplifies the explanation of the Narasimhan DMT. If you understood the previous post (in the rest of this post I will assume you didn&amp;#8217;t), then the finite-SNR result simply defines diversity as the slope of the outage curve at a given SNR. If you have the 3-D plot of outage versus SNR and R, then fix r. Then, for each SNR, the DMT curve is given by (d,r,SNR), where d is the slope of the outage curve at SNR. There is a little bit more to it, so keep reading even if you understood that. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] After my post on the diversity-multiplexing tradeoff, which seemed to create confusion instead of alleviating it, Prof. Heath asked me to clarify the finite-SNR diversity-multiplexing tradeoff proposed by Narasimhan in [1] (pdf). The previous explanation of the Zheng-Tse DMT really simplifies the explanation of the Narasimhan DMT. If you understood the previous post (in the rest of this post I will assume you didn&#8217;t), then the finite-SNR result simply defines diversity as the slope of the outage curve at a given SNR. If you have the 3-D plot of outage versus SNR and R, then fix r. Then, for each SNR, the DMT curve is given by (d,r,SNR), where d is the slope of the outage curve at SNR. There is a little bit more to it, so keep reading even if you understood that. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Peters</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-22852</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-22852</guid>
					<description>Yeah, I'll do that.  There are really two graphs that could easily explain it, but one is 3-D, and I'm not sure which software to use to draw it correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ll do that.  There are really two graphs that could easily explain it, but one is 3-D, and I&#8217;m not sure which software to use to draw it correctly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Heath</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-22840</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 06:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-22840</guid>
					<description>Really nice post with good use of equations and plots. I have to confess I just don't get it here. I would like to understand it more. Can you make a post that compares the DMT with the finite-SNR DMT. Something is missing in my mind. I want to clear this up for the MIMO book for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice post with good use of equations and plots. I have to confess I just don&#8217;t get it here. I would like to understand it more. Can you make a post that compares the DMT with the finite-SNR DMT. Something is missing in my mind. I want to clear this up for the MIMO book for sure.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ali Y. Panah</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-21593</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-21593</guid>
					<description>much needed. thx steve. are you gonna put up the figures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>much needed. thx steve. are you gonna put up the figures?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob Daniels</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-21399</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/02/the-diversity-multiplexing-tradeoff/#comment-21399</guid>
					<description>Excellent post Steve...this really is what the blog was designed for.  I'm looking forward to Prof. Heath's comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post Steve&#8230;this really is what the blog was designed for.  I&#8217;m looking forward to Prof. Heath&#8217;s comments.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

